The Lies of Fluoridation and who Benefits

[Myriel RAouine]

The Lies of Fluoridation and who Benefits

Fluoride not only damages, bones, teeth and our overall health, it turns
people into sheeple. It is working very well, don't you think? I use tooth
soap or baking soda. M

http://endofmen.wordpress
com/2008/02/03/the-lies-of-fluoridation-and-who-benefits/

The Lies of Fluoridation and who Benefits
Posted on February 3, 2008. Filed under: Big Picture, Communism, Corporatism
Friends, Globalism, Health, Main Articles, News, personal thoughts,
Political correctness, Politics, Video | Tags: Fluoride, Government, Health,
Hitler, Lies, Life, Tyranny, Water Fluoridation |
Flouride. You get it in toothpaste, some get it in their drinking water from
the tap. There are two types of flouride. Naturally occuring and artificial
flouride, or sodium hexafluorosilicate or hexafluorosilicic acid,
These compounds originate as side products from the processing
(“defluorination”) of phosphate ores to prepare fertilizers, food additives,
etc. Fluorides such as sodium fluoride (NaF), sodium monofluorophosphate
(“SMFP” or “MFP”, Na2FPO3), tin(II) fluoride (“Stannous fluoride”, SnF2),
and amine fluorides are common ingredients in toothpaste. Source.
Another take here:
Hydrofluosilic acid (H 2 SiF 6 ) and other fluorosilicates are not naturally
occurring. They are waste products derived from the industrial manufacture
of aluminium, zinc, uranium, aerosols, insecticides, fertilizers, plastics,
lubricants and pharmaceuticals.
Professor Kaj Roholm , former Chief of the Toxicology Committee for the
National Research Council the author of the first and most comprehensive
monograph on fluorosilicates classifies hydrofluorosilic acid and
hexafluorosilic acid as “extremely toxic.” One chemical company selling
fluoride to water suppliers describes it as “a colourless to straw yellow,
transparent, fuming, corrosive liquid with a pungent odour and irritating
action on the skin.” Source.
The government claims it is ‘good for your teeth’ and ‘the benefits are
proven’ (quite similar to the way they talk about Gardasil. Neither of these
claims are true, but the MSM has recently begun a push to inject the image
of mass fluoridation as a positive as “Health Secretary Alan Johnson is
going to give the go-ahead for it to be added to water.”
Once again cries will be heard opposing the plan – “it is the nanny state at
work”…”the benefits of fluoride are unproven”.
Both arguments are simply wrong. Fluoride makes a real difference, which is
particularly important for the nation’s dental health when we eat and drink
more sugary foods than ever, not to mention the chronic shortage of dentists

There is no proof that fluoride does any harm and a lot that it does good.
The only people who benefit by not adding it to water supplies are dentists,
because they get more work. And even they support the plan. Source.
As usual with these fluff pieces, no links to sources to check, just blanket
statements by some yellow journalist.
Here at End of Men we like to think for ourselves, so lets look at what
we’ve found about fluoride.
Firstly, those in power claim that fluoridating the public water supply will
help our teeth, the children’s mostly (as usual). Now, the mere statement of
government telling the people what is good for them and taking away their
ability to choose for themselves is the definition of a nanny state (or a
totalitarian one).
This readers comment from the Welland Tribune makes some great points;
It is a very different fluoride than what is used in toothpaste and at the
dentist’s office, or the naturally occurring fluorine.
At the time when hexafluorosilicic acid started being put in the water in
1945 in Grand Rapids, Mich., there were no fluoridated products available
commercially.
Crest introduced its fluoridated toothpaste in 1955, and Colgate added
fluoride in 1967.
We now have so many fluoridated products, from our toothpaste to floss and
mouthwash, which we can choose to use topically. We should be asking, why do
we need toxic chemical byproducts in our water?
Now, check your toothpaste tube, it says in bold, do not swallow.
It says this on toothpaste tubes, because toothpaste (fluoride) should most
definitely not be swallowed (ingested).
So the question that begs to be asked, why would we think that it is OK to
drink (ingest) fluoride, but not swallow toothpaste? The answer is, clearly,
it is not OK. Source.
Makes sense does it not. Even with the less dangerous fluoride in toothpaste
you are still instructed not to swallow it, yet the nasty hexafluorosilicic
acid in water should be swallowed with glassy eyed glee, and how is
swallowing the water going to help your teeth anyway?
What are doctors’ take on fluoride?
“Fluoridation … it is the greatest fraud that has ever been perpetrated and
it has been perpetrated on more people than any other fraud has.”- Professor
Albert Schatz, Ph.D. (Microbiology), Discoverer of streptomycin and Nobel
Prize Winner
“I am appalled at the prospect of using water as a vehicle for drugs.
Fluoride is a corrosive poison that will produce serious effects on a long
range basis. Any attempt to use water this way is deplorable.” – Dr. Charles
Gordon Heyd, Former President of the American Medical Association
“Fluorides are extremely reactive molecules which have been shown to cause
considerable harm in biological systems. They continue to be used by health
authorities for a specific medicinal purpose, namely the treatment and
prevention of dental caries, yet they have never been subjected to the full
risk/benefit analysis which is required in order to bring other drugs to the
market. Drinking water medicated with fluoride clearly amounts to
government-sponsored use of an unlicenced drug. It is staggering that
international bodies such as the United Nations’ Codex Alimentarius
Commission could have overruled the substantial scientific concerns about
fluoride in infant formula raised by several countries in November’s Codex
meeting in Chiang Mai, Thailand and that babies, the most vulnerable members
of our society, are made the innocent victims” – Dr Robert Verkerk,
Executive Director of the Alliance for Natural Health
Right, now what are the wonderful benefits of fluoridation? The following
quotes are from here.
The American Journal of Diseases of Children states: “With few exceptions
the biochemistry of fluorine (fluoride) emphasizes its toxic features. The
production of endemic dental fluorosis in human beings by drinking water is
an outstanding example of the toxic effect of the excessive intake of the
element.” Dental fluorosis is fluoride poisoning that causes hypomineral iz
ation (irregular calcification) and a disorder of ameloblasts (enamel
forming cells) that mottle, weaken and discolour childrens’ teeth. In 2000 ,
the Newcastle NHS Trust reported dental fluorosis in 54% of children aged
8-9 years compared to 24% of 8-9 year olds in non-fluoridated Northumberland

Okay….
The 1ppm (part per million) level of fluoride in UK water supplies deemed
“safe” by government is 100 times higher than normally found in mothers milk
Prof Paul Connett, a leading authority on fluoride, spoke out at the
Science, Medicine and The Law conference in London last week. He said,
“There are no benefits only risks for infants ingesting heightened levels of
fluoride at such an early age, [when] susceptibility to toxins are
particularly high.”
So in other words, the complete opposite of what the corporate media article
stated. But that should no longer come as a surprise to readers of this blog
Get them while they’re young eh? Think of the children indeed…
For a substance that is supposedly so wonderful, these studies and quotes
should not even exist. Yet the abundance of information and articles on the
negative effects of fluoridating water is seemingly endless.

If is so great, why is it being banned (or already has been banned) in so
many countries?
Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Finland, Luxembourg, Norway , Switzerland
West Germany, Netherlands and Italy have all banned the addition of
hydrofluorosilic acid to drinking water. So have Japan and India, where
fluoride occurs naturally and skeletal fluorosis (thickening of bones) is
prevalent. In 1942, the Lancet reported severe dental fluorosis in areas
where natural mineral salts such as calcium fluoride concentrations of one
ppm – the Government’s “safe” limit – caused skeletal defects in children
with poor nutrition. Source.
Yes this government thinks it is okay? The question I always ask when things
like this happen, is who benefits the most?
Now, considering the current corporatist governments (merger of state and
corporate power) that dominate the Western world, for a government to so
forcefully push for something where there is so much information that, at
the very least, should result in a suspension of the plans until more
impartial research is done (although enough has been done already) in my
experience means something is afoot. Those who have been watching the
behaviour of government closely will agree with me when I say it is rapidly
moving towards a police state., a tyranny where the citizens continually
have their rights stripped from them until they wake up with none.
Who else in history, I wondered, may have wanted to mass medicate their
populations, and why?
“At the end of the Second World War, the United States Government sent
Charles Eliot Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry,
physiology and pathology, to take charge of the vast Farben chemical plants
in Germany.
“While there he was told by German chemists of a scheme which had been
worked out by them during the war and adopted by the German General Staff.
“This was to control the population in any given area through mass
medication of drinking water. In this scheme, sodium fluoride occupied a
prominent place.
“Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an
individual’s power to resist domination by slowly poisoning and narcotizing
a certain area of the brain and will thus make him submissive to the will of
those who wish to govern him. “Both the Germans and the Russians added
sodium fluoride to the drinking water of prisoners of war to make them
stupid and docile.” Source.
Why am I not surprised where this is heading…
Fluoride used by Nazis to sterilize inmates and make them docile. Fluoride a
key dumbing down ingredient of Prozac and Sarin nerve gas — poisons of
choice for tyrant rats. Source.
Independent scientific evidence repeatedly showing up over the past 50 years
reveals that fluoride allegedly shortens our life span, promotes cancer and
various mental disturbances, accelerates osteoporosis and broken hips in old
folks, and makes us stupid, docile, and subservient, all in one package.
There are reports of aluminum in the brain possibly being a causative factor
in Alzheimer`s Disease, and evidence points towards fluoride`s strong
affinity for aluminum and also its ability to “trick” the blood-brain
barrier by looking like the hydrogen ion, and thus allowing chemical access
to brain tissue. Source.
Now hopefully you are starting to see the true reasons behind fluoridation.
Actually there is little that is novel in the concept of controlling the
minds and manners of the multitude by chemical/dietary means. That it was
practised by Hitler’s regime is made the more credible when we know that as
far back as 1938 the US Government, and ally to boot, and the government of
a democratic Christian country, was considering the transformation of
American citizens and others into ‘zombies’ by a number of proposed
techniques. The US Army searched for “the perfect incapacitating agent”,
according to General Fellenz, “to put in the enemy’s water supply”. Included
in the drugs tested were the hallucinogenic LSD and the amnesiac BZ (10
times more potent than LSD), and a “schizophrenic agent called bulbocapine”.
The “Rockefeller Report” to the United States President on CIA activities
said: “The drug program was part of a much larger CIA program to study
possible means of controlling human behaviour”.
Note: An adviser to the US Government on hypnotism or psychological
behaviour control, Dr George Estabrooks, later became Chairman, Department
of Psychology, Colgate University. Internationally, Colgate was and remains
the most ardent producer and advocate for the fluorination of a domestic
product – fluoridated toothpaste. Source.
I hope this raises some questions for you. Why should you not have the
choice to decide what goes into your drinking water? Why does the government
not put out all of this information and then put it to a public vote, as
they should? Why does the media not do more research? Why does the Health
‘Ministry’ endorse fluoridation when even other countries are banning it?
How is drinking fluoridated water better for your teeth than using
toothpaste? Why did Hitler use fluoride to pacify the population using mass
medication (which is in contravention of your human rights)? Why is
information regarding adverse reactions to fluoridated water in regions in
the UK being suppressed? Why is this coming out now, in the same year
Britain will be superseded by the European Union with the (treasonous)
signing of the final treaty and the current rise in public anger at
government policies?
Do you still think that the UK and US governments (which seem to be
strangely synchronised with their policies) are doing this for the children?
What, like when governments focused on women and children in Operation
Gladio?
Remember, keep asking questions. Your government is not looking out for you.
You are a means to an end for those who control the government. You now have
no choice but to take the matter of finding out the truth into your own
hands. Think for yourselves.
No To Fluoridation
Fluoridated and Chlorinated Water: Wide Range of Serious Health Problems
Mercola Fluoride Archive
The Fluoride Controversy
FLUORIDE II
Fluoride – The Lunatic Drug
Fluoridation, Mind Control of the Masses < A must read.
Health Secretary ‘misleading’ over fluoride benefits
Waterloo Watch Says Fluoride In Our Tap Water Is Unnecessary